![]() ![]() Kenneth Kipnis, Criminal Justice and the Negotiated Plea, 86 Ethics 93, 95 (1976) see also William Ortman, Probable Cause Revisited, 68 Stan. It “evolved in the unregulated interstices of our criminal justice system.” 1 1 Plea bargaining, we are told, is lawless. ![]() In so doing, it opens up not only new scholarly terrain but also new potential pathways to criminal justice reform. This Article excavates these unexamined legal frameworks, conceptualizes their regulatory potential, highlights their heterogeneity across jurisdictions, and exposes the institutional actors most frequently responsible for their content. ![]() Rather, they exist in strikingly varied forms across our pluralist criminal justice system. These hidden regulatory levers are neither theoretical nor abstract. The assumption is misguided, however, insofar as it fails to account for a third body of law-the subconstitutional law of criminal procedure-that regulates and often establishes the very mechanisms by which prosecutorial plea bargaining power is both generated and deployed. And yet, identifying plausible strategies for law reform proves challenging, given the widely held scholarly assumption that plea bargaining operates “beyond the shadow of the law.” That assumption holds true with respect to substantive and constitutional criminal law-the two most studied bodies of law in the criminal justice system-neither of which significantly regulates prosecutorial power. Few who know it well think it is working.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |